Author Topic: Deeker's Diaper Page  (Read 17887 times)

Alice

  • B&!!!!1!!11`
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1718
  • GIRL ON INTERNET
    • View Profile
Deeker's Diaper Page
« on: July 17, 2009, 05:13:41 pm »
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 05:18:37 pm by Kuroneko »

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6816
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2009, 05:58:10 pm »
God, not only is that site just weird and wrong, it's a terrible site :/ When will people learn that the web has changed since 1995?

Also: how the hell did you find this?
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 06:21:16 pm by Bobbias »
This is going in my sig. :)


BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

淫蟲

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • 我們要有思想改造
    • View Profile
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2009, 07:29:15 pm »
http://i31.tinypic.com/72fwpw.gif sweet jesus

Quote
I went to the bathroom at the verry back of belk because I needed changed and it is normally empty other than the occasional mall employee, when I walked in the four boys were all standing there in just there diapers. the oldest was getting ready to change the youngest but they had all stopped what they were doing when they saw me, the oldest looked like he was gonna kill me so before anyone could freak out I told him it was cool I was here for the same thing and dropped my pants. after that he was cool and I helped him change his brothers and then we changed each other

sauce: http://www.deeker.com/Sightings/ds_0804.html

This is just... vulgar.  Normally, if I stumble upon content on the internet that contains vulgar and/or offensive information, I laugh.  But this... what the hell is this?  This is a new tier of nastiness, the kind of which human eyes were never meant to lay eyes upon.  Don't they know that diapers are un-hygienic?

And to answer the question regarding where 黒猫 obtained this information, it was posted on Something Awful; a link was posted in #pooproad.

Oh and this

Quote
If you are a young female visitor (under age 12) I would especially like to welcome you to this web site. You are at a highly formative and impressionable age in which you are more apt to formulate strong opinions and perceptions towards diapered boys. Much of the focus on Deeker's Diaper Page is to point out and emphasize the need for all boys to remain conspicuously and amply diapered at all times; in stark contrast to their similarly-aged female counterparts who blatantly flaunt the fact that they do not need or want to wear diapers and do so by wearing pants, shorts, skimpy panties or (black) thongs in the presence of smelly, immature, pantsless, bare-legged, thickly and conspicuously white-diapered boys.

sauce: http://www.deeker.com/Articles/information_for_girls.html
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 07:33:48 pm by Pancake »

Alice

  • B&!!!!1!!11`
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1718
  • GIRL ON INTERNET
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 08:24:35 pm by Kuroneko »

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6816
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2009, 02:10:34 am »
I can't even think of any sort of properly formulated response. My instincts to stay as far away from this sort of thing as possible is kicking in.
This is going in my sig. :)


BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Nekros

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2009, 09:44:39 am »
This is just wrong :( :'( The only thing that I can say is that being a guy that goes commando (unless circumstances decide otherwise is working outside in the dead of the Canadian winter) I can not imagine this. I mean I've heard of it before, but that was on TV (CSI to be exact), I didn't think there was actually people who did it.

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6816
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2009, 04:29:00 pm »
Dude, if you see it on CSI and it isn't something tied directly to the killer (like the whole miniatures thing) it's likely happened somewhere before.
This is going in my sig. :)


BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Alice

  • B&!!!!1!!11`
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1718
  • GIRL ON INTERNET
    • View Profile
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2009, 04:56:46 pm »
Yeah, shows like that have a habit of using Ripped From The Headlines plots and subplots.  Remember when like three shows had a furry episode, all within one year?

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6816
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2009, 10:52:50 pm »
Haha, yeah. They did a good job at portraying all furries as a bunch of crazy freaks, lol.
This is going in my sig. :)


BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

MortifiedocAlot

  • I GOT GULD STERRRRZZ
  • Hero Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4784
  • ಠ_ಠ
    • View Profile
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2009, 01:57:30 am »
What is this, I don't even.

I hate diaper fetishes. It's like they promote childish behavior, fucking disgusting hygiene, and this very odd and gross sexual aspect that involves them acting like a child during it. It seems to borderline pedophilia, in a weird fucking way.


Milk Chan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
  • I shit a rhyme out
    • View Profile
Re: Deeker's Diaper Page
« Reply #10 on: January 26, 2010, 03:56:59 am »
I've heard of this guy forever ago. He's a fucking disgusting pedo and even the community he's associated with sees him as the black sheep of the community.

He's kinda like Chris Chan except not sonic/pokemon obsessed.